Intro to Homeopathy Pt. 1
© 2006 by William Peters


What Is it?

There are two main kinds of medicine. The one most of us are familiar with is called allopathic medicine. the term allopathy means 'Different Suffering', and uses medicines which produce different effects than the disease it is used to treat. I call allopathy N2 D2 medicine as doctors typically follow a Name the Disease, Name the Drug approach.

Homeopathy means 'Similar Suffering' and relies on medicines which produce the same effects as the disease. This system of medicine was developed by Dr. Samuel Hahnemann as a result of observations he made while working as a medical text translator. He was translating an article about the use of quinine to treat malaria. At the time, the prevailing thought was that quinine worked because it tasted bitter. Hahnemann didn't think that sounded plausible, so he took quinine to see what would happen. The quinine gave him the symptoms of malaria, even though he didn't actually have the disease. This observation lead him to the discovery that like cures like -- similar suffering -- and homeopathy was born.

Most people think that the heart of homeopathy is the 'infinitesimal dose', the way the medicinal substances are highly diluted. However this is not true, and even the purest classical homeopaths didn't always use high dilutions of substance. The heart of homeopathy is matching the effects of the drug to the patient's symptoms. This is not the same as matching the drug to a specific disease.

Diluting the medicines was originally done in an attempt to alleviate side effects. Some of the early drugs were highly toxic, both for homeopathic use, and allopathic use. For instance, mercury was often prescribed 100 years ago for the treatment of the common cold, and for the treatment of syphilis. It worked, but the patient often suffered the debilitating effect of mercury poisoning. In fact, the use of mercury as a cure-all lead to the term quack, which is short for the german word 'quacksalber', or today in America, we would say quick-silver meaning mercury.

The Proving.

The substances used for homeopathic healing have always been tested on healthy human volunteers, usually med students, to find out what effects they cause, and thereby what disease symptoms they will cure. A large group of people are given the drug to take over a few weeks time. This is called 'proving' the drug. Each volunteer keeps a diary of all the effects the drug has upon him, IE: changes to his health, including his emotions, mental ability, physical symptoms, what part of the day they occur in, which side of the body they happen to, what conditions the prover had which improved, and things which make the symptoms better or worse. At the end of the trial period, the results from all the provers is combined, common elements are noted, and things which only happen to a small portion of the group are assumed to be from some other influence. In this way, a picture of how the drug affects a typical person emerges. The results of the provings for all the substances tested are then compiled in a book called the Materia Medica where any drug available can be referenced.

The Materia Medica is an indispensable tool for the homeopath, but there is another tool which he needs. It is called a Repertory. The Repertory is a book with almost every possible symtom of illness that had been seen, cataloged by areas of the body, and then more detailed descriptions under that. With each classification, there is a list of every drug which produces that symptom when given to a healthy person.

Prescribing.

To use these tools, and prescribe a drug for a patient. A classical homeopath will take the case history, and examine the patient (a very lengthy process... typically 1 to 2 hours), and find all the key symptoms the patient has. Then by consulting the Repertory for each symptom, and recording all the drugs that produce each symptom, the homeopath can work out which of all the drugs produces a match to the most important symptoms of the patient. After having done this, the homeopath then looks up that drug in the Materia Medica to verify that the picture of the drug matches the symptom picture of the patient. Before computers, this could have taken several hours in itself. Thanks to the computer, the drudge work of the Repertory can be fully automated saving the practioner a lot of time. Of course, after gaining experience, the homeopath gets to know the drugs well enough that he doesn't always have to rigorously do the Repertory work. He just knows the drug picture when he sees it in a patient. If the homeopathic physician does not match the drug as closely as possible to a patient's exact symptoms, it is not homeopathy, regardless of how the drugs were made!. Also, a homeopath will never prescribe combinations of drugs or multiple drugs at the same time, as there would be no clear picture of the drug combination. One drug at a time is the rule.

My first experience.

The first experience with homeopathy, and indeed my first experience with any form of alternative health care, happened in the early 90's. Five years before, I had been struck down with cancer and had very extensive surgery to remove it. I had all of my lymph glands removed from my abdomenal cavity. The aftermath of that was that for the next five years, I had constant pain, and was always sick. It seemed no one could help me, until I visited a health clinic in New Jersey where they had a homeopathic practitioner. Jane was not even a licensed physician, she was an artist who had studied with other homeopaths for quite a few years. Since Jane was not an actual physician, she could not actually prescribe for me. Instead, she gave me a private 2 hour lesson in homeopathy, using my own case for an example. After a 2 hour "training session", Jane pointed me to a drug called Thuja Occidentalis (Tree of life, or the Arbor Vitae bush).

I took this drug for 2 days, and nothing at all happened. On the third day however, I got sick, with exactly the same feelings and symptoms I had right after the surgery. This continued for about 2 days as I replayed the recovery from the tremendous assault I had endured. Then.... it was gone! I had finally recovered (as much as possible, I can't regrow body parts) from a curse that had lasted 5 years. I was sold on homeopathy!. So I took some classes to learn more.

Jane treated me once more, as I had been prone to pneumonia, and had contracted it three years in a row. Jane prescribed Sulphur for me, and it cured the pneumonia quicker than the antibiotics had, plus I haven't had pneumonia in the 10+ years since.

But how does it work? It makes no sense to take something which gives me more of what I already have!

What most people perceive as symptoms of illness is actually the effects of the body's immune system battling the disease. The disease agent is busy chomping away at your cells replicating itself and flooding your body with poison, but thats not what you experience. You experience fever, throwing up, diahrhea, etc. This is your immune system at work. Vomiting expels poisons from your body as does diahrhea. Fever prevents viruses from replicating. Swelling is your body diluting the toxins. The smartest doctor of all is your own immune system. All of this internal battle requires energy and strength in your immune system. By taking a non-toxic substance which produces the same effect as your immune system does while fighting a particular disease, some of the load is taken off the immune system and taken up by the drug. This is akin to bringing in reinforcements on the battle field. The drug augments the immune system. It is your immune system which ultimately effects the cure!

One of the beautiful aspects of homeopathy is that it is not necessary to know what disease a person actually has. It is only necessary to know the symptom set of the patient. This means that with a little training in the technique, ordinary non-medical people can do remarkable things for themselves and their families in the way of treating ordinary illnesses like colds and flu. I consider it a skill which everyone should learn for the day when visiting an MD might not be possible.

Can it cure everything?

No, of course not, but neither can allopathy. In todays's world, we are faced with diseases and symptoms that were not prevalent when the original homeopaths did the drug provings. For instance, 100 years ago heart disease was almost unheard of, and blood pressure was not routinely checked like it is now. It was not considered important. As a result, there is no information in the Materia Medica and the Repertory about hypertension. It is such a shame that homeopathy was all but put out of business by the AMA. If it had not been, there would have been a lot more advances in the drugs and techniques available.

Spanish Flu

One of the biggest events which suggest that homeopathy works and works very well was the Spanish flu outbreak in 1918. At that time, there were homeopathic hospitals, and allopathic hospitals in the US.
A report to the American Institute of Homeopathy in 1921 documented the dramatic success of homeopathy in the worst flu pandemic in history. The death rate of 24,000 flu cases under conventional medical care in that study was 28.2 percent, while the death rate of 26,000 cases treated with homeopathy was a nearly miraculous 1.05 percent. Similarly, many homeopathic physicians each reported treating thousands of patients with very few deaths.1

In the homeopathic hospitals, the majority of patients were given gelsemium which increases body temperature, which augmented the body's own immune response. In the allopathic hospitals, aspirin was the drug of choice, and aspirin reduces body temperature, effectively working against the immune system. In the next installments, I will tell you how to make 'potentized' drugs, the highly diluted and energetic drugs that homeopaths usually prescribe, and tell you of a shortcut that you can instantly make use of.

1) Divine Odyssey

Click here to go to Part 2